The Norman Transcript

Letters

March 7, 2010

Understanding Norman’s Greenbelt Commission

Norman — We are three members of a subcommittee of the Norman Greenbelt Commission asked by the city to draft an amended Greenbelt Ordinance. In 2004, section 4-2023 of the City of Norman code established a Greenbelt Commission to “advise the city council on policies pertaining to the promotion, acquisition, maintenance and improvement of the open spaces, greenways and trailway systems in the City of Norman.” As part of their duties, Greenbelt Commissioners were asked to establish and review Greenbelt Enhancement Statements to be submitted by developers to determine “how the goals and objectives of Norman’s Greenbelt System plan are met by the proposed development”.

During the process of creating enhancement statements that are useful as guides to implementing the city’s greenbelt goals and objectives, we as commissioners have been reviewing plans and forwarding our recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. However, we have done this with no written guidelines to assist us with our evaluations or the developers with formulating their plans.

The amended draft Greenbelt Ordinance, which was presented to the public by the Greenbelt Commission at their regular meeting Jan. 25, is meant to provide these guidelines. We would like to address several comments made at the Jan. 25 meeting. 

· “The ordinance gives the GBC regulatory powers”. This is simply not true. We are an advisory commission. We make recommendations to the developer, the planning commission and the city council. The amended ordinance gives the Commission no regulatory authority.

· “The ordinance adds unnecessary cost and time to a project.” Greenbelt enhancement statements are intended to be submitted by developers quite early in the development process, before plans are submitted to the planning commission and before detailed engineering is required, thus, when submitted at the proper time, they should not add significant cost or time to a project.

· “The ordinance is vague… criteria are too broad.” The ordinance lays out guidelines, not regulations, and thus they are by necessity somewhat broad in order to allow flexibility to development. Not all criteria will be applicable or even feasible for each development application, and they are not meant to be. It is not in the best interest of either the City of Norman or the development community to impose detailed, restrictive quantitative criteria to guide greenbelt development. However, guidelines are needed to enable developers to know what is helpful and to enable the Commission to evaluate Greenbelt enhancement statements and make appropriate recommendations.

· “The subcommittee has not considered input by the development community.”  This, again, is not true. Commission meetings are open to the public and members of the development and real estate community have attended and presented their concerns. In addition, we as a subcommittee met with members of the development community at their request, listened to their concerns and considered their suggestions. We incorporated their suggestions when they were consistent with the goals of the city to enhance and protect open space without blocking development, and we think the draft ordinance is stronger because of this process. However, we did not wholesale adopt all of their suggestions because it would have rendered the ordinance ineffective.

A great deal of thought has gone into the crafting of this draft ordinance. We as a subcommittee of citizen volunteers have spent many hours on it over the past year. We have received a great deal of input from the development community, but not as much as we had hoped to get from the other citizens of Norman. However, in multiple community surveys and planning exercises over the past 15 years Norman citizens have identified greenways/trails and greenbelts as a high priority for the city. A greenbelt system will not happen by itself; it will take a concerted effort on the part of Norman’s citizens. The draft ordinance is a significant step in establishing this system. We invite you to review the ordinance at: www.normanok.gov/content/greenbelt-commission and send the Greenbelt Commission your comments and suggestions through the e-mail address on the Web site above or to Greenbelt Commission, P.O. Box 370, Norman, OK 73070.

Text Only
Letters
  • Homosexuals must convince themselves, God

    Editor, The Transcript: I am not one of those in favor of same-sex anything. According to the Bible, homesexuality is a sin. Now maybe there is a new Bible out there — the homosexual Bible. I will check at Barnes & Noble....

    May 27, 2012

  • Occupy movement built on principle

    Editor, The Transcript: We the People Stand Tall! Bruce Kessler ends his letter to the editor “We the people must stand up — 8 May, 2012,” with a strong message: We the people — the very words that begin our Constitution — must work ...

    May 27, 2012

  • Parents proud of two schools’ rankings

    Editor, The Transcript: Norman parents are justifiably proud that U.S. News and World Report recently ranked Norman High School as No. 6 in our state and No. 862 in the nation and Norman North as No. 9 in the state and 1,096 in the nation ...

    May 26, 2012

  • Reducing state rates would be of minor help

    Editor, The Transcript: A Transcript editorial (May 22), in discussing the proposed reduction in income tax rates in HB 3061, states that the “trigger” mechanism is a good thing, citing the rate cut from 5.5 to 5.25 because of the 4 ...

    May 26, 2012

  • Sykes trying to secure seat

    Editor, The Transcript: By the time this reaches you, the issues surrounding HB 2440 may have been laid to rest. Based on your article of this date, let me make these observations....

    May 25, 2012

  • Corporate deception rules

    Editor, The Transcript: Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase’s chief executive, said he does not know how the bank lost $3 billion (originally estimated at $2 billion) in a trading scheme. He called the trades “sloppy” and “stupid” but could not ...

    May 24, 2012

  • Bike racks should be available

    Editor, The Transcript: Biking to shop doesn’t need to be difficult, either. Yet so many merchants fail to provide bicycle racks and water fountains. And a bench to repack your purchases so you can carry them easily on your bike would be ...

    May 24, 2012

  • Bold reform needed in DHS

    Editor, The Transcript: Serenity Deal, a five-year-old girl, was brutally beaten and died at the hands of her father while in the custody of DHS. Serenity is only one of the nearly 50 children who have died while in foster care over the ...

    May 23, 2012

  • Milbank’s partisan attack

    Editor, The Transcript: The column on your editorial page on Monday, May 14, by Dana Milbank of the Washington Post Writers Group calling Mitt Romney “the cowardly candidate” must be answered....

    May 21, 2012

  • Biking to work doesn’t need to be difficult

    Editor, The Transcript: I am disappointed that the Norman Transcript chose to focus on an extreme for the Bike to Work article. While I don’t discredit Stephen Swanson and his cycle commute, I feel that highlighting a 22-mile bike commute ...

    May 20, 2012

The Business Marquee
Facebook