Editor, The Transcript:
“Why so much for the land?”
On the Transcript's Sunday editorial page Roy L. Brown asks the question above, comparing the cost per acre of the proposed Potts' conservation easement with the cost per acre of the Kuhlman conservation easement, acquired in 2002. It is a valid question. I appreciate the opportunity to explain the difference.
The short answer to his question is because the Potts' property, albeit in the floodplain, was zoned Residential 1(R-1) in the early 80s and is adjacent to an existing residential development. By contrast the 107 acres of the Kuhlman conservation easement at the southeast corner of Porter and Franklin was and is zoned agricultural. Both properties are in a floodplain. Everything else is different-location, the year with its corresponding property values, and the zoning.
Roger Spears of Mannford, who appraised the Potts' property, is one of only two appraisers in Oklahoma qualified by Internal Revenue Service (IRS) training to appraise conservation easements. Mr. Spears has appraised conservation easements in many parts of Oklahoma. In this case he appraised parcels separately, based both on present zoning and use. For example, the oil well site, with R-1 zoning, was appraised at $0, while acres out of the floodplain with R-1 zoning were appraised in line with similar property in the area.
It has also been claimed that properties in the floodplain cannot be developed, therefore purchasing development rights are not necessary. Unfortunately this is not true.
The preservation of farm and ranch land is a priority for the United States government. The City of Norman expressed a similar goal, Goal 6: Greenbelt Development, in the Norman 2025 Land Use and Transportation Plan.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has provided funds in recent farm bills to help acquire conservation easements, essentially development rights, from willing sellers, on prime or locally important soils. In the 2008 Farm Bill, preservation goals have been expanded to cover lands important to a community. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly the Soil Conservation Service, administers these funds for the USDA.
The Norman Area Land Conservancy (NALC) was incorporated in 2000 and later applied for private non-profit status, after Norman's Greenbelt Task Force expressed the need for a local conservancy. One of NALC's goals is to consider farmland in the floodplain because it is often the most productive farmland and is usually reasonably priced.
In 2004 NALC applied for and received an NRCS grant, which included the Potts property. These federal dollars require a local match. We approached the City of Norman for the match. The City Council responded by encumbering funds for a match, should we find willing sellers of conservation easements on their property. All of the funds are paid to the willing landowner/seller of development rights, creating a perpetual conservation easement filed in the courthouse, running with the land title. The owner still owns the land.
One of the many things I appreciate about Norman is alert citizens, who watch what is going on and ask their questions. I hope that I have been able to provide useful facts. I believe that the protection of this land is a good deal for Norman's citizens.
Lyntha Wesner,
Vice President,
Norman Area Land Conservancy, Inc.
Letters
NEW: Residentially zoned land costs more
- Letters
-
-
More government intrusion
Editor, The Transcript: Kudos to Kathryn Jean Lopez of the National Review Online for telling it like it is (Transcript Opinion, Feb. 12, 2012) regarding President Obama’s religious “overreach.” No, Mr. President, your latest knee-jerk ...
-
It’s time for Valentine’s Day
If it’s full of hearts and flowers And a cupid with a dart, That’s a card that’s mighty pretty and aimed right for your heart....
-
Gov. Fallin’s tax plan is one big mistake
Editor, The Transcript: Well, it’s official now. In her State of the State message, Gov. Fallin confirmed that she hopes to reduce the state income tax now and totally eliminate it later. Big mistake, for two compelling reasons....
-
Another Library Vote? Good grief!
Editor, The Transcript A new library on the west side? With hardly any books? With a dumb name above the entry as shown in your rendering? Infoplace? The library bureaucracy must think Norman voters just fell off the turnip truck....
-
Eliminating state taxes places burden on poor
Editor, The Transcript: Your editorial on Feb. 8th that expressed your pleasure that the bill by Jim Wilson that would have removed the sales tax exemptions from newspapers was killed in committee was disconcerting. I can agree that the ...
-
Not time to experiment with state taxes
Editor, The Transcript Governor Fallin proposed more cuts to the state income tax in her State of the State speech Feb. 6. This comes on the heels of a House Tax Reform Task Force that also proposed phasing out the state income tax over a ...
-
Local investment is better for Norman
Editor, The Transcript Americans from all walks of life and political ideologies are asserting their voice to tell Wall Street “Enough is enough!” Occupy Norman members spoke at the Dec. 13 Norman City Council meeting, urging the city to ...
-
Decline in unions harmful to economy
Editor, The Transcript Remember sometimes you get what your ask for? Let’s see, what could that be? I know, destroy those evil unions which are compromised of the middle class....
-
Independent group needed
Editor, The Transcript: I wanted to write a letter a long time ago, but Ms. Rogers’ letter claiming that “Chromium levels in the water shouldn’t cause alarm” pushed me over the edge. As an environmental professional in Oklahoma, I have ...
-
Obamacare is socialist nightmare
Editor, The Transcript: And now for the rest of the story… “Obamacare, Another Entitlement Nightmare.” The recent St. Louis Post Dispatch editorial reprint illustrates the sophistry that characterizes the liberal mindset now grasping the ...
- More Letters Headlines
-
More government intrusion
